The effect of  “live up to the characters’ lives”, indirectly , is one of those goals, the #1 for any movie director: whenever we relate, or want to relate to those movie figures without thinking how true is that script at first sight. Surely we don’t focus what’s true and what’s not, based on real life or made-up scenes. We more to appreciate a good ending for loving characters and thats goes to the written made-up screen play. 

In a moment we just forget this is just a story that shown on tv, movie platform, to a public — to us, people —, and therefore MUST to hold a certain narrative that lies with social values, lessons that suppose to sink into our heads. Not because directors or screen writers are so keen to teach us how to live, it’s more backing on a standard state approve that keeps an eye on what nation(s) watch and what kind of ideas are send to them, daily.  Including, leaning heavily on state’s positive image (propaganda) to win more tourists abroad. Ah, very classic way to cave that ‘sticky’ interest to your culture, remotely.  I call it, a Hollywood style : create an image to anything that all would want to link themselves to — to a land :“dreams come true”, “live, laugh , love”; to its people: “strong and powerful nation” , “fight for human rights”…, + add beautiful people and breathtaking landscapes on camera.     

ANTI GOAL… 

When it comes to drama movies: Pathetic life of two that decided to gave up on their love and for the rest of lives be with other people just because they couldn’t find another way to their ‘real’ soulmates, is not what should be told to people. It is negative, pathetic, flicking a panicking thought of life being meaningless. Is it not?  It’s basically telling us ‘Hey, don’t fight for your love’, ‘Gave up’, ‘You would be happy with another one, or on your own’ . A reckless stance without respect and responsibilities for own words and deeds, lil or none values — TOTALLY wrong message to the public:

• ‘…don’t fight for your love’, What’s that? Pathetically sending a task to just “let it be”, go on with your life and don’t care much, LOVE is just love, the next one will be somewhere around the corner, no need to stick with one. Thats how we would get an idea of polygamy, fooling around, what would never be approve in society (especially in the East);
• ‘…time would heal, …with another one , or alone’, so this tells us no matter how badly you were in love and what you felt, it would be shortly forgotten and no worries, more soulmates for you out there, just open your door, and yeah surely, you can be more than happy by yourself. Hey, pard my language but sexual chronic infections and demographical issues might come from those mentioned terms. Besides propounding a mental toughness (forget and move on), which in this precisely context lies with fear to fail — in my view it shows more weakness and low self esteem.

Overall, all examples are weakening the mean of family and love: Saying that ‘LOVE would not save the world’. SO here comes to us, do we really think that any movie that brings such narrative would go flashy, smoothly, with the authority checks, the “prove and confirm” point before reaching us, an audience?

When I say  a “wrong message” I mean that its not approved by government,  by certain men and ladies in suit on the top chairs, who manage interests and norms of society by sponsoring those movies, events, projects, festivals, and so on.